Issue

Back
January 2022

Private criminal complaint against doctors in case of medical negligence cannot proceed without expert opinion holds Supreme Court

Prabhat Kumar Singh  v/s The State of Bihar & Ors. 
15MLCD (j1) | Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of: None


In COVID times “putting the doctors to a criminal prosecution for negligence would lead to create a lot of emotional disturbance”, observes Chhattisgarh High Court

Sanjay Ambastha v/s State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.        
15MLCD (j3) | Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur
Judgement in favour of: Doctor


Not referring to a higher facility but managing an emergency patient - Not an act of omission, holds court

J. N. Shori Multi Speciality Hospital & Anr. v/s Krishan Lal & Anr.
15MLCD (j6) | National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of: Doctor


“Charter of Patient’s Rights” framed by the National Human Rights Commission relied upon by a Consumer Court in a case of medical negligence for the first time

Gujarat Consumer Protection Council & Anr.   v/s Medical Superintendent, V. S. Hospital & Anr.     
15MLCD (j9) | Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ahmedabad
Judgement in favour of: Patient


Surgical patient admitted in a medical ward and also left unattended - Court holds hospital negligent

Narendra Kumar Sengar  v/s The Director General, Railway Hospital & Ors. 
15MLCD (j17) | Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of: Patient


Failure to explain the rationale behind not hospitalising / monitoring regularly – Court draws adverse inference

Gagandeep v/s Chunni Lal Memorial Gulati Hospital & Ors.
15MLCD (j24) | Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh
Judgement in favour of: Patient


Patient suffers from malaria during hospitalisation post-cardiac surgery – Standard protocol was followed, hence no negligence observes court

Baby Shaistha v/s M/s. Wockhardt Heart Centre & Ors.  
15MLCD (j36) | National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of: Doctor


Court gives doctor chance to redeem himself in a case of obvious negligence - Are Indian courts pro-doctors?

Dr. Veena Panda v/s Bijayshree Singh & Anr.   
15MLCD (j39) | Odisha State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Cuttack
Judgement in favour of: None




How To Get Maximum
    From the Editors Desk
  • Handing Over The Baton – Welcome Dr. Shreekant Shetty, our new Editor

    Read
  • What are the changes that have happened in your journal?

    Read
  • We want you to be acquainted with both sides of the coin

    Read
  • How is this journal made?

    Read
  • How to get the maximum out of this journal

    Read
  • Is this journal the need of the hour?

    Read
  • The First Editorial

    Read

  • Publishes ‘real time judgments’ on medical negligence from higher courts
  • Every judgment is further summarized in simple, non-legal language
  • Comprehensively guides a doctor on avoiding MedLegal issues
  • Suggests practically useful ‘Do’s & Don’ts’ in day-to-day practice
  • Cases selected / analyzed solely from a doctor’s viewpoint
Testimonials FAQs Get Complimentary Copy