Medical Law Cases - For Doctors

Just Published | May 2026

Substituting a paediatrician with a BAMS doctor / teleconsultation in an infant’s emergency care – Hospital penalized for this JUGAD

Rainbow Hospital v/s Ravinder Verma
19MLCD (j191) | Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula
Judgement in favour of: Patient

Red flag in court – Changing ink / handwriting while writing medical records held as negligence

Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital & Anr. v/s Kumari Swechha Kothari & Ors.
19MLCD (j194) | National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of: Patient

Consent is non-negotiable – Negligence not found in pre-surgery Stress Echo test but in failure to take consent

Sandeep Gupta v/s Max Super Speciality Hospital & Ors.
19MLCD (j211) | Uttarakhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dehradun
Judgement in favour of: Patient

Mismatch between typed and handwritten discharge summaries proves costly in court - Why share both with patients / court in the first place?

Max Balaji Hospital & Ors. v/s N. R. Mishra
19MLCD (j215) | Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of: Patient

More...

Know Your Journal

How To Get Maximum

Publishes ‘real time judgments’ on medical negligence from higher courts
Every judgment is further summarized in simple, non-legal language
Comprehensively guides a doctor on avoiding MedLegal issues
Suggests practically useful ‘Do’s & Don’ts’ in day-to-day practice
Cases selected / analyzed solely from a doctor’s viewpoint

Testimonials FAQs Get Complimentary Copy

The medical law reporters for Indian doctors

The medical law reporters for Indian doctors

PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE

Substituting a specialist’s care in emergencies with other doctors is negligence

- Haryana State Consumer Commission | MLCD May 2026

A change in ink / handwriting in medical records could be viewed adversely by courts

- National Consumer Commission | MLCD May 2026

Failure to obtain consent for pre-surgery tests could be construed as negligence

- Uttarakhand State Consumer Commission | MLCD May 2026

Sharing a rough draft of discharge summary could turn costly in court

- Delhi State Consumer Commission | MLCD May 2026

Just Published | May 2026

Substituting a paediatrician with a BAMS doctor / teleconsultation in an infant’s emergency care – Hospital penalized for this JUGAD

Red flag in court – Changing ink / handwriting while writing medical records held as negligence

Consent is non-negotiable – Negligence not found in pre-surgery Stress Echo test but in failure to take consent

Mismatch between typed and handwritten discharge summaries proves costly in court - Why share both with patients / court in the first place?

Most Popular

Doctor provides his own and his wife’s mobile number for emergencies, but mobile was switched off when contacted - Deficiency of service observes court

Patient signs a consent but that surgery gets postponed for 2 days due to medical reasons - Old consent is valid holds National Consumer Commission

Surgeon who assisted the principal surgeon also held liable – “As a surgeon he has duty towards the patient and decision making” observes National Consumer Commission

Issuing opinions / certificates without physically examining patients is professional misconduct but removing doctors name from MCI Register is not the only punishment, holds Delhi High Court

Supreme Court doubles the compensation granted by lower court as consequences of medical negligence directly affected the patient's social / professional life

Displaying Registration number in the OPD / clinic is not enough, it should also appear on the prescription / stationery of every doctor

High Court quashes criminal proceedings under POCSO – Rules doctors not bound to “investigate and gather knowledge” about patients’ age, but will believe what is disclosed to them

Doctor first confesses his fault for patient's death in writing and then seeks police protection on the same day – This presence of mind proves the "nexus of coercion" in court

Know Your Journal

From the Editors Desk

PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE

Substituting a specialist’s care in emergencies with other doctors is negligence

- Haryana State Consumer Commission | MLCD May 2026

A change in ink / handwriting in medical records could be viewed adversely by courts

- National Consumer Commission | MLCD May 2026

Failure to obtain consent for pre-surgery tests could be construed as negligence

- Uttarakhand State Consumer Commission | MLCD May 2026

Sharing a rough draft of discharge summary could turn costly in court

- Delhi State Consumer Commission | MLCD May 2026

Just Published | May 2026

Substituting a paediatrician with a BAMS doctor / teleconsultation in an infant’s emergency care – Hospital penalized for this JUGAD

Red flag in court – Changing ink / handwriting while writing medical records held as negligence

Consent is non-negotiable – Negligence not found in pre-surgery Stress Echo test but in failure to take consent

Mismatch between typed and handwritten discharge summaries proves costly in court - Why share both with patients / court in the first place?

Most Popular

Doctor provides his own and his wife’s mobile number for emergencies, but mobile was switched off when contacted - Deficiency of service observes court

Patient signs a consent but that surgery gets postponed for 2 days due to medical reasons - Old consent is valid holds National Consumer Commission

Surgeon who assisted the principal surgeon also held liable – “As a surgeon he has duty towards the patient and decision making” observes National Consumer Commission

Issuing opinions / certificates without physically examining patients is professional misconduct but removing doctors name from MCI Register is not the only punishment, holds Delhi High Court

Supreme Court doubles the compensation granted by lower court as consequences of medical negligence directly affected the patient's social / professional life

Displaying Registration number in the OPD / clinic is not enough, it should also appear on the prescription / stationery of every doctor

High Court quashes criminal proceedings under POCSO – Rules doctors not bound to “investigate and gather knowledge” about patients’ age, but will believe what is disclosed to them

Doctor first confesses his fault for patient's death in writing and then seeks police protection on the same day – This presence of mind proves the "nexus of coercion" in court

Know Your Journal

From the Editors Desk

Key Features