The medical law reporter for Indian Doctors
Advertise with Medknow
Click here to view April 2016 issue as eBook Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page

 


Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
  Access statistics : Table of Contents
   2015| August  | Volume 8 | Issue 8  
    Online since January 29, 2016

 
 
  Archives   Previous Issue   Next Issue   Most popular articles   Most cited articles
 
Show all abstracts  Show selected abstracts  Export selected to
  Viewed PDF Cited
CASES
Is this the beginning of a new trend? Experience of the doctor specifically taken into account by the court

August 2015, 8(8):117-118
  274 8 -
Taking a decision on the operation table - The legally tenable way

August 2015, 8(8):119-121
  55 11 -
Improper discharge summary termed as a "cryptic document" by the court

August 2015, 8(8):132-133
  61 4 -
Antibiotics, antimalarial and antitubercular drugs administered for 49 days "without any justification" - Negligence not "empirical treatment" holds court

August 2015, 8(8):127-129
  52 4 -
Hospital's defense that original medical records were with the doctor who performed surgery rejected by the court

August 2015, 8(8):124-126
  50 5 -
Patient's inability to pay for the indicated therapy - No justification to proceed with something that is not indicated

August 2015, 8(8):122-123
  48 6 -
Delay in giving consent for cesarean - A common Indian phenomenon

August 2015, 8(8):137-138
  43 9 -
"Commercialization of medical services to be taken into account" in granting compensation - National Consumer Commission

August 2015, 8(8):130-131
  47 4 -
Court presumes that post surgery, the specimen was sent for HPE as it "is a standard protocol," even though the HPE report was not produced in the court

August 2015, 8(8):134-136
  38 4 -